Biologist working in forestry

endless

Working in forestry from a biologists point of view is quite interesting.

Work days consist of field work and office days, what predominates depends on the season. The interesting part is, of course, working in nature. We conduct various measurements. For example, one type of measurements is called constant sample surfaces. There has to be a team of two, equipped with measure tapes, compass, maps, gps and a folder with the specification sheets. The maps and gps lead us to the exact spot on the particular surface where we monitor the state of the forest, the state of particular trees and wood increment.

The work is awesome because we’re basically paid to hike. I get to observe the awakening forests in the morning and encounter forest animals: foxes, deer, squirrels, salamaner, fish, crustacea, amphibia, birds, the list goes on… I also observe the crawling world of invertebrates; decapoda, ants, earthworms… I get to listen to bird songs all morning and can now identify by sound and sight almost all of the local dwelling ones – goals achieved, yay!

Working in a position like this gives one the perspective of how different biologists and foresters actually are. This way it becomes completely clear why we studied in different branches. From the first look of it – at least I thought so – we aren’t that different, clearly we all are interested in nature, plants, animals and their preservation. It turns out we don’t have as much in common in those areas as I thought. Some foresters chose this branch namely for the reasons I named, others are more into wood and profit. The latter was something I learned a new. Maybe it’s something that should be clear from the start. Peter Wohlleben has described well where forestry goes off track. On universities they primarily learn about forest management. In authors words, he only knew about forests as much as a butcher knows about animal felings. Where he wanted to know how forest ecosystems function, they learned about cutting down healthy trees in their lush growth and where to spray chemical products. So he removed himself from that world and wrote the book The Hidden Life of Trees : What They Feel, How They Communicate-Discoveries from a Secret World. Long story short. 🙂

The book gives a new perpective of the forests and individual trees. Basically it shows just how little we actually know about trees.

Our forests (in Central Europe) mostly consist of the following trees:

  • beech (Fagus sylvatica)
  • spruce (Picea abies)
  • pine (Pinus sp.)
  • fir (Abies alba)
  • oak (Quercus sp.)
  • chestnut tree (Castanea sativa)
  • larch (Larix decidua)
  • birch (Betula pendula)
  • linden (Tilia sp.)
  • aspen (Populus tremula)
  • maple (Acer sp.)
  • ash (Fraxinus sp.)
  • hornbeam (Carpinus sp.)
  • alder (Alnus sp.)
  • rowan (Sorbus aucuparia)
  • elm (Ulmus sp.)

To name a few.

Working in forestry is great, though. This work enables us to enjoy the nature and moments where we feel like the right part of this world.

Erythronium dens-canis
Erythronium dens-canis

earth colorsEarth colors

colostygia sp.
Blend in. This might be Colostygia sp. Not sure, biologists?
morning magic forest
Magic beech/spruce forest in the morning.
Helleborus sp.
Helleborus sp. Again – not sure about the species…
ponys
Ponys at the local farm.
prunus in bloom
Prunus sp. in bloom
Salamandra salamandra
Salamandra salamandra
steep
The terrain can be quite steep. Yes, we had to climb up here. 🙂
tall orchard
A tall orchard.
vinca minor
Vinca minor
views
The views!
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s